Dems/Libs…Will the truth set you free?

1. The American people elect a black president with a total of 142 days experience as a US Senator from the most politically-corrupt state in America whose governor is ousted from office. The President’s first official act is to order the close of Gitmo and make sure terrorists civil…

Counter to the ‘truth’ from ThomasR:

1. Sarah Palin.
You offered no truth, just someones name.

2. Joe the Plumber.
You offered no truth, just someons names.

3. Glenn Beck.
A registered Independent

4. Bill Oreiley.
A registered Independent

5. Ted Stevens.
Charges dropped.

Using a dead woman to make a point, typical classless liberal.

The truth sets you free from the other truth. For every thousand people, there are probably around nine hundred and ninety different and unique accounts about similar situations. Colour is a good example. There are certain shades of red that a huge number of people would call orange, and some others would have other names for. Is the colour orange, red, or ‘separated ketchup’? All of them are true. It all depends on the viewer. There is only one truth, but many ways of presenting it. Is the Gulf war a good thing? There are valid arguments across the board to show that the entire world, in particular Iraq, will benefit from this war. A lot of lives saved, a lot more made easier. However, for every advantage there is a disadvantage, also across the board. Personally, I hold the view that the war has destroyed international economy, ruined the allies’ reputations, and devastated millions of lives. The opposite of what I just described, but no less true. The truth fully depends on the eyes that see it. ((((hugs)))) ~Loving Light~

When you are President or rule over a country you have to go by a set of rules or standards. Those prisoners or terrorists as some call them were not directly linked to the 911 attacks. They had no reason to hold them, but did anyway. Therefore their rights under the laws and rules of war, prevents them from being there.
I hate to talk about the FBI or the CIA but it was my understanding that the first George Bush put his son in charge of the CIA and if you want to downplay it now, it’s a little late for that.
I didn’t bother to read the rest. The first part was enough to say that you are misinformed with your information and any change is better than what we had or didn’t have in the first place, which was honesty, integrity, and bringing the “we the people” back into the system.

Quote: “The President’s first official act is to order the close of Gitmo and make sure terrorists civil rights are not violated. (He screwed up!!)”

After nearly 7 years many of these detainees haven’t been charged with a crime-

Would rather live in a country where all they have to do to lock you up forever is declare you an enemy of the state?

1. False, he had 12 years of experience, not that it matters. 35 years of age and a US citizen…and a majority vote is all that counts.
Charges and trials are what our Constitution says. If you want to whine about it, I suggest you live in Iran…where no such laws are upheld.

2. who cares. Obviously, he isn’t running the law firm any longer.

3. that is false. Linda isn’t his daughter.

4. you have no source or validation for this claim. Given Cheney and Gonzoles and Rumsfeld, it is odd that you would call Clinton corrupt.

5. When was he tried for tax evasion or cheating? He made a mistake and paid it back…happens to millions of people all the time.

6. -10. See #4

wow, lets pretend this is actually a question and not just a chance to preach. I don’t really understand any of it either, and I spent most of my time with liberal views. (now communist, but whatever) I usually side with the democrats, but now I’ve been wondering if there is really any substance to either of them. Personally, I just think its a game, it doesn’t matter what side is in office, the result will just about be the same.

The whole world knows that Reps/Cons under George Bush was immoral, fiscally irresponsible and got us involved in an unnecessary war. You’re not fooling anybody when you try to look smart by talking about the “truth”. You’re just another neocon fool that can’t come to grips with the fact that your whole political ideology has been proven wrong.

How much of that will be taken from your tax dollars? None!

If the current administration bothers you that much, I can only assume that you spent all of the Bush years in a coma.

‘The American people elect a black president’

Why does it matter that he is black?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *