Like, If there were no anti religious.. do you think we would be denying science? or we would pray instead of finding answers in reality? would there be no doctors, separation of church and state, do you think there would be many wars and violent disagreements, what do you think?
Personally I’m glad there…
Remember the Dark Ages? That’s what happens.
The anti-religious folks in the past generations definitely helped to benefit society, but they’re not really needed now. Kind of like soldiers when there’s no war. They want one, so they find fights wherever they can find ’em.
I’m not too keen about being “anti-religious” myself. I don’t really care what other people believe, I just enjoy having discussions about it sometimes. But, I have to admit that Dawkins, Hitchens, etc. have done a great job, since somebody needs to put religious fanatics in their place when they start attacking other people’s freedoms.
You do know that most wars have been motivated by politics, power and resources and not religion right? Less violent disagreements? You’d be ignorant to believe that there would be less, its human nature.
Not sure exactly what you’re referring to when you say ‘anti-religious.’ But I do think that non-believers have benefited society.
Not believing in religion does not make it anti-religious.
Anti-religious people are bigots. Plain and simple. End of story.
Religion is childish and infanttile nonsense, and should be banned